(Disclaimer: This page is under development)
(Disclaimer: This page is under development)
A useful distinction is made between unexploded ordnance (UXO) and abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO). UXO refers to explosive ordnance that was primed, fuzed, armed or otherwise prepared for use, and that was fired, dropped, launched or projected but failed to explode as intended. AXO, by contrast, refers to explosive ordnance that was not used during an armed conflict but was left behind, discarded or dumped and is no longer under the control of the party that abandoned it. Both UXO and AXO can pose serious risks, whether through detonation or through the release of hazardous substances as materials corrode.
Munitions in the sea therefore include several different types of contamination as listed by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (here). These can include:
These different categories are important because they shape both the risks involved and the possible response options. Sea mines and torpedoes, for example, were specifically designed for underwater use and often contain large explosive charges. Dumped munitions and ammunition in shipwrecks may in some cases present a lower immediate explosive risk, but can still create major environmental hazards through corrosion, leakage and the concentration of large quantities of ordnance in one location.
At the same time, munitions in the sea are not only a legacy issue of the past, but also a contemporary and evolving challenge. While a large proportion originates from historical conflicts, new contamination continues to occur in certain regions as a result of ongoing military activities and conflicts, most notably in the Black Sea. This highlights that the issue remains dynamic and evolving.
In addition, the characteristics of munitions in the sea differ significantly between marine regions. In some areas, such as parts of the Baltic Sea, munitions are found in relatively shallow and nearshore waters, often in close proximity to human activities. In other regions, including parts of the North-East Atlantic or deeper basins, munitions may be located at considerable depths or concentrated in specific dumping sites. The types of munitions present, their condition, and the surrounding environmental conditions also vary widely.
These regional differences have important implications for risk assessment, monitoring and management approaches, and underline the need for context-specific solutions.
When addressing munitions in the sea, it is also essential to distinguish between different approaches to managing the problem. In particular, the terms clearance and remediation are often used, but refer to different concepts and objectives.
Understanding what is meant by munitions in the sea, and how different types of contamination are categorised, is essential for placing the issue in context. More information on History, Risks, and Policy Frameworks can be found below.
(Acknowledgement: Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. (2025, April). Underwater explosive ordnance.)